๐Ÿšš no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.5/5 from 953+ reviews
Kids โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Boy WWE Pajama Shorts

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.5 out of 5(953 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$13
$21.67
Sale
โœ“ complimentary distribution on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Like new. It has no flaws. The shorts are extremely velvety and made out of silky material.

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
swift Shipping
โ†ฉ๏ธ
straightforward Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Boy WWE Pajama Shorts

Like new. It has no flaws. The shorts are really velvety and made out of silky material.

This product is remarkable for anyone looking for quality Kids products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 645781

Category: Kids > Boys Bottoms > Boys (4+)

Original Price: $21.67 USD

Sale Price:$13 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

๐Ÿšš distribution & Returns

โœ“ at no charge fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.5
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 1357 reviews
AW
Ashley White โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Baltimore, MD
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
simply what I wanted
After certain use, it is practical which feels reasonable. Packaging was plain.​
21 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท Sacramento, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
certainly impressed
At first, the Boy WWE Pajama Shorts works as described and Iโ€™m satisfied.
47 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท St. Louis, MO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Five stars!
The Boy WWE Pajama Shorts arrived quickly.
47 people found this helpful​
BT
Brittany Turner โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago ยท Seattle, WA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Couldn't be happier
Honestly, it performs as expected which feels reasonable.
39 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Chicago, IL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
treasure love love!
After assorted use, it performs as expected and it works for me.
45 people found this helpful