🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 835+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Amethyst Gold Tone Ring

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.1 out of 5(835 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$27.55
$45.92
Sale
βœ“ complimentary distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Adjustable size no hallmarks .

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift Shipping
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Amethyst Gold Tone Ring

Adjustable size no hallmarks .​

This product is remarkable for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 688947

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Rings

Original Price: $45.92 USD

Sale Price:$27.55 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ at no charge fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 4567 reviews
AP​
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Cleveland, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
ultimate decision
In daily use, the Vintage Amethyst Gold Tone Ring works as described and it’s fine overall.
45 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Memphis, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
appreciate this Vintage Amethyst Gold Tone Ring!
Feels sturdy enough. The Vintage Amethyst Gold Tone Ring doesn’t feel economical.
30 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· San Diego, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
superb in every way
The Vintage Amethyst Gold Tone Ring looks favor the pictures. That’s good.
22 people found this helpful
AC
Amber Carter βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Boston, MA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…​
superb investment
Would advise the Vintage Amethyst Gold Tone Ring.
21 people found this helpful
LN
Lauren Nelson
7 months ago Β· Atlanta, GA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
delightful product
So far, the Vintage Amethyst Gold Tone Ring does its job so no complaints. No setup issues.
5 people found this helpful