🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.7/5 from 844+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Better wool fabric (157)

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.7 out of 5(844 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$6
$10
Sale
βœ“ complimentary distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Better wool fabric (157)16x7Rust, brownSmoke on the house home

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy delivery
↩️
accessible Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Better wool fabric (157)

Better wool fabric (157)
16x7
Rust, brown
Smoke at no charge home​

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 756435

Category: Vintage > Supplies > Fabric

Original Price: $10 USD

Sale Price:$6 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ no-cost distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.7
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2026 reviews
BW
Brandon Wright
11 months ago Β· Omaha, NE
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
simply what I wanted
Honestly, the Better wool fabric (157) feels okay so no complaints. Packaging was plain.
17 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly satisfied
After a few days, it feels solid enough so it’s acceptable.
33 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Denver, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
No complaints
Nothing special about the Better wool fabric (157), but it’s functional.
49 people found this helpful

BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Baltimore, MD
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
only what I wanted
Fair quality Better wool fabric (157) for the price. Gets the job done.
11 people found this helpful
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Chicago, IL

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
The Better wool fabric (157) was slightly smaller than I expected, but still usable.
22 people found this helpful