๐Ÿšš no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.7/5 from 305+ reviews
Women โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Longchamp Sunglasses LO 707 S 208 Havana Rose

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.7 out of 5(305 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$79.95
$133.25
Sale
โœ“ complimentary distribution on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
speedy Shipping

โ†ฉ๏ธ
plain Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Longchamp Sunglasses LO 707 S 208 Havana Rose

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Women products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 2156559

Category: Women > ACCESSORIES > Sunglasses

Original Price: $133.25 USD

Sale Price: $79.95 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

๐Ÿšš fulfillment & Returns

โœ“ on the house distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.7
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 7552 reviews
BT
Brittany Turner โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago ยท Indianapolis, IN
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Highly satisfied
Personally, the Longchamp Sunglasses LO 707 S 208 Havana Rose does its job so Iโ€™m okay with it.​
39 people found this helpful
TT
Thomas Taylor โœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago ยท Virginia Beach, VA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Super happy
After a few days, the Longchamp Sunglasses LO 707 S 208 Havana Rose is basic to use and it meets expectations.
23 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark โœ“ Verified Purchase​
7 months ago ยท San Diego, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
marvelous product
At first, the Longchamp Sunglasses LO 707 S 208 Havana Rose is practical so Iโ€™m okay with it.
6 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท Phoenix, AZ
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
terrific investment
To be fair, it feels okay so no complaints.
23 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท Miami, FL​
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Five stars!
The Longchamp Sunglasses LO 707 S 208 Havana Rose does what it should.
8 people found this helpful